A federal judge in Seattle blocked President Trump’s executive order pausing the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program, arguing that the order exceeded the president’s authority and nullified congressional will. The judge stated that the order likely violated administrative law and separated powers. Plaintiffs in the case argued that the suspension of refugee admissions and family reunification violated Congress’ authority and basic regulatory requirements.
The Justice Department maintained that Trump was acting within his authority to make determinations regarding national security and immigration. The plaintiffs argued that the harms caused by the order, such as refugees being separated from their families and stuck in processing limbo, couldn’t be undone with money damages.
The lawsuit was brought by community groups and affected refugees, including one scheduled to come to the U.S. with his family from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Trump’s order cited the need to protect American resources, safety, and security by suspending the program until it aligns with U.S. interests.
The judge indicated that a detailed written order would follow, and the Justice Department proposed a narrow injunction involving only plaintiffs proven to face irreparable harm. The plaintiffs argued for a comprehensive injunction to redress the proven harms they faced.
In court filings, the Justice Department argued that Trump had the authority to make decisions regarding national security and immigration. The case highlights the ongoing legal battles over Trump’s immigration policies and the balance between presidential authority and congressional oversight.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.
