A North Dakota jury recently found environmental advocacy group Greenpeace liable for its involvement in the 2016 Standing Rock protests, awarding Energy Transfer $667 million in damages. The lawsuit, lasting nine years, accused Greenpeace of orchestrating the protests through misinformation and eco-terrorism.
Despite the verdict, Greenpeace stood by its values of non-violent activism and solidarity with the water protectors at Standing Rock. The organization refused settlement offers that would have required them to betray Indigenous communities or compromise their stance on the Dakota Access Pipeline.
Throughout the legal battle, Greenpeace maintained a commitment to duty of care, prioritizing the well-being of activists and community partners. Despite facing potential bankruptcy, Greenpeace chose solidarity over financial safety, setting an example for standing firm against legal harassment and corporate pressure.
While the verdict may mark the end of Greenpeace U.S. as it is known, it signifies a broader commitment to duty of care and solidarity in the face of legal repression and corporate interference. Greenpeace’s resilience in the face of the lawsuit serves as a model of resistance for the future, emphasizing the importance of institutions willing to bear the weight of activism and remain steadfast in their values.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.
