Two opponents of Measure 2 in North Dakota are advocating for the protection of the state’s initiative process. The measure, which is set to appear on the November ballot, would require constitutional amendments to be approved by a majority of voters in two different elections in order to be passed.
The opponents, David Briggs and Connie Kolberg, argue that Measure 2 would make it more difficult for citizens to bring about change through the initiative process. They fear that it would limit the ability of grassroots organizations and individuals to address important issues in the state.
Briggs and Kolberg are concerned that Measure 2 could potentially undermine the democratic principles that are enshrined in North Dakota’s constitution. They believe that the initiative process allows for direct participation in government by the people, and that any effort to weaken or restrict it would be detrimental to the state’s democratic values.
In response to their concerns, they have launched a campaign to educate voters about the potential impact of Measure 2 on the initiative process. They are urging North Dakotans to vote against the measure in order to protect their right to bring about change through citizen-led initiatives.
The opponents of Measure 2 are encouraging voters to carefully consider the implications of the measure before casting their ballots in November. They believe that the initiative process is a vital tool for citizens to have a voice in government, and that any attempts to undermine it should be strongly opposed.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com