Despite being a predominantly Republican-leaning state, South Dakota is feeling left out as one of the many “flyover states” that are often neglected in presidential politics. In a recent column by Kevin Woster in the Mitchell Republic, it was highlighted that South Dakota rarely receives the attention and focus from presidential candidates that swing states typically do.
Woster pointed out that the state’s lack of electoral college votes, only three, makes it less of a priority for candidates seeking to win the presidency. In contrast, swing states with larger populations and more electoral votes receive significant attention during election cycles. South Dakota’s voting history also plays a role, as it has consistently voted for Republican candidates in recent elections, making it a less competitive state.
While South Dakota may not receive the same level of attention as swing states, Woster emphasized that the state still has important issues that should not be overlooked by presidential candidates. These include agriculture, energy production, and Native American issues, all of which play a significant role in the state’s economy and way of life.
Despite being overshadowed in presidential politics, South Dakota residents still have the opportunity to make their voices heard in other ways, such as attending candidate events or participating in local politics. Woster encouraged residents to stay informed and engaged in the political process, even if the national spotlight may not shine as bright on their state.
Overall, Woster’s column sheds light on South Dakota’s position in presidential politics and highlights the importance of being informed and active in political decision-making processes, even in a state that may not receive the same attention as swing states.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com
