Former North Dakota Governor Jack Dalrymple has recently announced his campaign against Measure 2, a proposed constitutional amendment that would greatly impact the state’s budgeting process. The measure seeks to change the state’s budgeting process by requiring a two-thirds majority vote in both chambers of the legislature to increase taxes or spend earnings from the state’s permanent oil trust, known as the Legacy Fund.
Governor Dalrymple argues that Measure 2 is a flawed proposal that would hinder the state’s ability to respond to emergencies and address critical needs in areas such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. He believes that the measure would impose unnecessary restrictions on the state’s budgeting process and could lead to gridlock in the legislature.
Dalrymple is not alone in his opposition to Measure 2. Many lawmakers, including Republicans and Democrats, have also spoken out against the measure, expressing concerns about the potential negative impact it could have on the state’s ability to provide essential services to its residents.
Supporters of Measure 2, however, argue that the measure is necessary to ensure responsible budgeting and prevent unnecessary spending by the state government. They believe that requiring a supermajority vote to increase taxes or spend earnings from the Legacy Fund will promote fiscal discipline and prevent wasteful spending.
As the debate over Measure 2 continues to unfold, Governor Dalrymple’s campaign against the proposed constitutional amendment is sure to garner attention and spark further discussion among North Dakota residents. With the November election quickly approaching, voters will have the opportunity to decide the fate of Measure 2 and determine the future of the state’s budgeting process.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com
