The new ballot measure approved by voters in North Dakota restricts people aged 80 and above from running for Congress, representing a potential test case for the nation. Legal scholars believe the law could remain unchallenged due to the lack of elderly candidates affected by the restriction. The measure aims to revisit a Supreme Court ruling against congressional term limits and has sparked debate amid the presidential race and the ages of prominent politicians like Joe Biden and Mitch McConnell.
Experts argue that the age limit could be unconstitutional based on previous rulings, but a challenge would require someone with standing to bring a claim. The measure is set to take effect immediately pending certification of election results, with potential legal costs estimated at $1 million. Critics question why the age limit wasn’t applied to other public offices if proponents are confident in their argument.
Despite potential challenges, supporters believe the measure reflects overwhelming support for age restrictions in Congress. The path to a federal lawsuit could be lengthy, but courts have shown speed in cases regarding ballot access or candidate qualifications. Senator Kevin Cramer, who opposed the measure, voiced concerns about limiting voters’ choices and undermining self-governance.
Overall, the age limit measure in North Dakota has sparked legal and political debates, raising questions about constitutional rights and democratic principles. Any potential challenge could have far-reaching implications for future elections and the balance of power in Congress.
Source
Photo credit www.ksat.com